FIND MONEY WITHIN YOUR BUSINESS
Your
company has more money than you realize. You just don’t know where to find it. Yet.
After delivering a keynote on Profit
First, I was invited to a dinner with board members of Vistage, an organization
for business owners, presidents, and executives; they call themselves the
World’s Leading Chief Executive Organization. It was a unique situation because
instead of standing in front of a few hundred people, speaking for sixty
minutes, and then exiting stage left, now I was sitting at a round table for a
few hours to address an onslaught of questions about Profit First.
One executive, the only consultant
at the table, stated why he believed Profit First wouldn’t work. To protect his
name, I’ll call him Mr. Wrong. He made all of the classic nonsensical
arguments. “If you don’t have profit already, you can’t suddenly start taking
it,” Mr. Wrong scolded, looking around the table for approval. “Profit has to
be the bottom line,” he argued. “Start-ups can’t hold back on spending if they
want to grow.” Blah. Blah. Blah. Wrong. Wrong. Wrong. That last myth really
annoys me because it is that kind of thinking that prevents business owners not
only from benefiting from their hard work and ingenuity, but it also stunts
growth.
Then another gentleman—I’ll call him
Mr. Innovator—had a lightbulb moment and without thinking, blurted out, “Split
the truck. Split the truck. Split the truck.” Everyone looked at him as if he
were a bit off, and then he explained.
He said, “I grew a
fifty-million-dollar company by doing my own version of Profit First.”
Mr. Innovator explained that his
company delivered oil to two primary outlets: businesses that stored hundreds
of gallons at a time, like Jiffy Lube, and retail stores that put quart
containers on the shelves, like Walmart. They delivered the oil using two types
of trucks: a tanker to deliver to the Jiffy Lubes of the world and a shelf
truck to deliver to Walmart. Nearly every aspect of their business was
duplicated. Two trucks, two drivers, two customer service teams—two of
everything.
“The costs were too high. We were
barely surviving,” he said.
Mr. Innovator knew he had to cut
costs in order to achieve his profitability goals. So he challenged himself to
cut his costs by at least one third while still servicing the same number of
customers. He kept asking himself that bigger, better question: How can we keep
doing what we’re doing for one third of the cost?
Then one day it hit him. “What if we
took a box truck and divided it in half?” he recounted. “One side for a tank
and the other side for shelves.” Now his company could deliver oil to both the
Jiffy Lubes and the Walmarts of the world using one type of truck, operated by
one driver. Mr. Innovator put the idea in motion and ended up surpassing his
goal, cutting expenses nearly in half. This simple shift enabled him to
grow his struggling business to a $50 million company with a sweet bottom line.
Mr. Wrong never uttered another
peep. And Mr. Innovator picked up the check for the entire table with a smile.
Money is everywhere.* Money can always be found through streamlining
and innovation, and that begins with asking the big questions. The impossible
questions. The questions no one else would ever dare to ask. No one else but you.
IT’S SMARTER TO DIG A WELL THAN MAKE
IT RAIN
I have yet to meet an entrepreneur
who hasn’t wanted to hire a rainmaker, that magical salesperson who, like the
companies that say they can give you access to your great-grandmother Sally’s
unclaimed fortune, will save the day by bringing in big sale after big sale.
Never mind the fact that we, the owners and leaders who love our companies and
what we do, are the ultimate rainmakers; it is this top line approach to
solving a cash flow crisis that holds companies back. Cranking up the sales
team in order to make it rain is not going to help your company if you don’t
have efficiencies in place, because, ultimately, whatever new client revenue you
generate will have corresponding costs. And these are likely to go unchecked.
If you want to increase
profitability (and you’d better friggin’ want to do that), you must first build
efficiencies. Focusing solely on increasing sales is like setting up a bunch of
rain barrels next to your house and doing some frantic rain dance in a
loincloth while ignoring a massive water source beneath your feet.
Take Idaho, for example. Idahoans
enjoy an average of seventeen inches of rainfall each year, twenty inches under
the national average. Hence, 95 percent of the state’s water supply comes from
underground. The 135-mile-long Big Lost River collects water from the Rocky
Mountains as it winds through Idaho and then just disappears as it goes
subterranean. The water from the Big Lost River, the Snake River, and other
underground water sources collects in the Snake River Aquifer, which measures
400 miles wide. That is enough water to serve the majority of Idaho’s
agricultural needs. So that Idaho spud you’re munching on is thanks to an
underground water supply—not some rain dance Idahoans learned on the Internet
(albeit Idahoans know how to get their funk on).
Why should you care about Idaho and
its underground lakes? Because 95 percent of your company’s profitability is
contingent on what goes on beneath the surface (after the sales), not what
happens in the sky (the sales themselves). And it is what’s going on
“underground” that will help you “find” gobs of money.
THE PROFIT SQUEEZE
A few years ago I was asked to keynote
the Global Student Entrepreneur Awards in Washington, D.C., where leading
collegiate entrepreneurs from all over the world gather and are recognized for
their incredible impact. At breakfast on the morning of the event, I ended up
sitting next to Greg Crabtree. Greg is the author of Simple Numbers,
Straight Talk, Big Profits! Greg caught my attention immediately, talking
with another gentleman at our table about college football. I inserted myself
into their discussion (“Go Hokies!”), and soon enough the conversation drifted
to entrepreneurs and profitability. I remember thinking: “Hold on—we are
talking about college football and profitability. There is a God!”
After Greg recounted some
information he shares in his book about how to maximize profitability, I asked,
“Is there such a thing as too much profit? Is there a ceiling?”
“You always want to expand profit,”
Greg replied. “In fact, you must, because there are outside forces that will
continually take your profitability away—your competition. As you find ways to
increase profitability, or even if you don’t, your competition is doing the
same. Everyone is trying to become more profitable. And as businesses become
more profitable, the competitive pressure sets in and prices drop to attract
more customers.
“When you figure out a big leap in
profitability, the competition will sniff it out, and it is just a matter of
time before they do the same thing. Then someone drops prices to get more
clients, and everyone else, including you, has to do the same to stay in
business. This is how profits get squeezed.”
We’ve seen the phenomena Greg
outlined over and over. Consider flat-panel televisions, for example. They
became commercially popular in the early 2000s but were still a luxury item
until around 2005, when the cost of big-screen TVs started dropping 25 percent
each year. By the end of the decade, vendors had dropped the prices so
significantly that it seemed retailers were practically giving them away. Then,
because manufacturing televisions got easier and easier, profits jumped, but
only for a short time. It wasn’t long before everyone started dropping prices
again to capture demand, to the point where it now seems as though a retailer
needs to pay you to take a small or last year’s flat-panel model. James Li, the
chief executive of Syntax Groups Corporation, maker of the Olevia brand of
flat-panel televisions, said of his competitors, “If they go to $3,000, I will
go to $2,999.”
Profit is a slippery animal. When
profit margins are big, usually in excess of 20 percent, people sniff out and
almost immediately start to duplicate what you’re doing, and they look for ways
to do it better, faster, and above all, cheaper than your company. I’m not, in
any way, saying that you should stop investing in efficiency and thereby
(temporarily) increase profit. I’m saying that even if you think you’re good
with profit, you’re not. The competition will squeeze you eventually, and soon,
so keep finding ways to do what you do better, faster, and cheaper. The nice
thing is that as you keep your profit allocation percentage consistent, you
will automatically be forced to find ways to make it happen. For example, when
competition sets in and prices drop, your profit allocation will feel the
squeeze, which means it’s time to innovate again.
TWO TIMES THE RESULTS WITH HALF THE
EFFORT
By now you’ve figured out that
focusing solely on top line thinking (sales, sales, sales!) does not lead to
profitability. In fact, more sales, without efficiency, lead to further
inefficiency. In other words, more sales make you less profitable. It’s a
vicious cycle. So you may need to slow down or halt your selling while you look
for new efficiencies—before you can focus on sales, you must first nail
Efficiency 101. Remember the toothpaste analogy? Think of this process as like
switching your regular-size tube of toothpaste for one of those travel-size
tubes. How are you going to make it last? Remember, Parkinson’s Law is your
ally. A full tube of toothpaste can last four weeks, and so can a tube that is nearly
empty. It just requires the balance of frugality (using conservatively) and
innovation (twisting, turning, and squeezing your ideas) to pull off what no
else even considered before.
Efficiency increases your profit
margins, or the amount of money you earn as profit on each product or service
you offer. Increased profit margins will boost your company’s profits without
the need for increased sales. And then, when you kick the selling machine back
into gear (which we will discuss later), profits will skyrocket. So the method
is simple: achieve greater efficiency first, then sell more, then improve
efficiencies even more and then sell even more. Over time, speed up the back
and forth between efficiency and selling until the two happen simultaneously.
Making your company more efficient
is about more than just nixing extra coffee breaks and redlining your expenses.
To tap into the river of profit flowing just under the surface of your company,
you need to look at efficiency in every aspect of your business. Serving the
same types of (great) clients with the same or very similar problems and
perfecting your solutions so you can use them consistently to fix their
problems are two routes of efficiencies. You want to duplicate your best
clients, those who have a consistent need; and in turn, you want to reduce the
variety of things you do for the fewest that will best serve your best clients’
needs. Think McDonald’s. That company is a moneymaking machine because they
feed hungry people—who don’t care, at least in the moment, about their health
as much as their hunger—with a few products: fries, hamburgers, and breaded
chicken. The fewest things you can do repetitively to serve a consistent core
customer need—this spells efficiency.
I want you to set a massive goal for
yourself. Look at every aspect of your business and determine how to get two
times the results with half the effort. That’s a biggie, so I will say it
again:
How do you get two times the results
with half the effort?
Effort is financial cost and time cost
(your time, your people’s time, your software’s time, your machine’s time). For
example, if you own a snowplowing company and currently plow one parking lot
per hour, I would ask you to figure out how to plow two parking lots (two times
the results) in thirty minutes (half the time).
Your first thought might be, “Easy
for you to say! That’s impossible, Mike! You don’t know my business! You’re
nuts!” I’m not offended by criticism, not even from those who spouted off
without ever cracking open the book, because I know most naysayers are just
scared. Maybe you’re scared, too. Maybe you’ve made personal sacrifices for
your business, sacrifices you may no longer be able to justify, because you will
have time for your family and friends. Maybe you’re afraid that doing more in
less time will make your role less significant. Maybe you’re worried that your
customers may not want to pay you as much if it appears you can do more with
less.
Whatever the reason, if you believe
that it’s impossible to increase efficiency in this way, you are trapped in
“let the other guy figure it out” mode. The thing is, my friend the other guy will
figure it out. It’s only a matter of time.
If instead you say,
“Hmm. . . let me think about that. Let me find a way,” you will set
your company on the path to skyrocketing profitability. Why? Because innovation
occurs in small steps, big leaps, and everywhere in between. To double the
results with half the effort is a big goal that forces big thinking, and it
brings about small and big progress—all of which goes to the bottom line.
Doing more with fewer resources has
had a significant impact on my businesses. I am very active in Hedgehog
Leatherworks, and employing Profit First triggered degrees of innovation that I
strongly suspect no one else in the leather industry has ever achieved.
Removing our ability to buy the traditional expensive equipment used in the
leather industry forced us to find new cheaper ways to get the same (and in
many cases, better) results. It’s amazing what you can pull off when you’re
scrounging Home Depot, Hobby Lobby, and random junkyards to make what
you need. (A little duct tape goes a long way, pal.) We invented new systems
that achieved better results than industry standards at 1/100th the cost.
Because we took Profit First, we made hundreds of innovations—tweaks, hacks,
brand-new systems and everything in between—all because we had to. My
editor begged for details about what we discovered, but because our process is
proprietary, I had to leave him hanging. Sorry, Kaushik—don’t want you leaving
the book industry to start a competing leather business!
Most entrepreneurs focus only on
tiny improvements—“How do I do this a couple of minutes faster?” Small
questions yield only small answers. You want both the incremental improvements
and the landslide discoveries, and you’ll find both of those with big
questions.
Snowplowing a parking lot five
minutes faster is not going to make much of an impact on your bottom line.
Neither will skipping your coffee break or just “holding it” when you need to
go to the bathroom.
But the more you focus on
substantially improving efficiency, such as a snowplow that can move snow twice
as fast, the closer you’ll get to achieving double the results with half the
effort. And you’ll discover all the small steps that collectively get you
closer to the big win. This gain in efficiency is amplified the more you sell.
That is the power of percentages. Because you now plow every parking lot more
efficiently, every new account is an opportunity for increased profit.
Remember Mr. Innovator? He asked,
“How can I cut costs by one third and still service the same amount of
customers?” Split the truck. Split the truck. Split the truck.
Here’s another truck story: Did you
know that United Parcel Service (UPS) trucks almost always take right turns? In
2006, UPS dared to ask the efficiency question about fuel costs. They
discovered that the less time UPS drivers spent in left turn lanes, the less
fuel they burned waiting at lights and to cross traffic, and the less idle time
there was for each driver. UPS is now experiencing a savings of $6 million a
year from the change.
The “brown truck” company didn’t
stop with their first efficiency discovery. Next time you see a driver
delivering a package, look at him and try to spot his keys. Let me give you a
hint: They are not in his pocket (that’s a banana). UPS drivers found that
fumbling for their keys in their pockets when they got back into the truck cost
them five to ten seconds (or more) every time. UPS figured out that it is more
efficient to keep their keys hanging from their pinky fingers. Now, a UPS
driver makes a quick flip of his wrist and the keys are in his hand. Multiply
that saved five to ten seconds by fifty stops a day and five gazillion drivers
and you have a very huge savings indeed.
And they didn’t stop there either.
UPS also found that they could save millions by washing their trucks once every
two days rather than every day. Over time, this gave them huge savings in time,
energy, and water—and the trucks looked just as shiny.
Look, it may seem impossible when
you first hear my challenge, but if you’ve never seriously asked yourself, “How
can I get two times the results with half the effort?” how do you know that you
can’t? You might be missing your own no-left-turn, pinky-flip,
don’t-wash-yourself efficiency miracle and not even realize it.
CHIP AWAY AT EXPENSES
Wesley Rocha didn’t take a raise in
ten years. The founder of LinkUSystems, a company that provides marketing
services, tools, and Web site design for the real estate industry and small
businesses, Wesley watched his company grow and his own income remain stagnant.
“I didn’t understand why it seemed like even though we would make more money,
we never had any left over. I felt stressed about finances all the time.”
Wesley finished reading Profit
First in a weekend, and realized quickly that his expenses were way out of
control. “I couldn’t immediately implement [cutting costs] without grossly
damaging projects, or the business. I literally needed all of my employees and
90 percent of everything we had been paying for because were stuck and
committed to it,” Wesley said. “I was afraid of what could break or go wrong if
I implemented Profit First too quickly. So I had to start thinking about how I
could eliminate expenses carefully.”
Little by little, Wesley started
chipping away at his expenses. “Over the past year, unfortunately, I have had
to release six employees, but have been able to replace their efforts by
eliminating unprofitable products and services, re-creating and optimizing
processes and streamlining other portions of the business,” Wesley explained.
“Now, I am able to determine what expense is allowed [for a project] before we
take it on. Otherwise, we have to figure out another solution.”
Figure out another solution. Music to my ears. Not, “We have to find more money to
cover it.” Nope. Time to crack the knuckles and find another way out of the
corn maze, because the airlift ain’t comin’.
In the first year of implementing
Profit First, Wesley was able to double his profits, which allowed him to
increase his annual income by approximately 46 percent, between salary and
disbursements. “I have been able to set aside money for taxes and use profits
to help toward a down payment to buy a house, which before would have been
impossible.”
There’s that word again: impossible.
At first, Wesley thought he couldn’t possibly cut expenses and continue to
serve his clients. And yet, after a year, he was able to do just that, which
allowed him to do this other “impossible” thing, something he hadn’t been able
to do in more than ten years of kicking ass in business: save for a down
payment on a house. In every year past, despite growth, he never had any money
left over. And yet by cutting expenses and streamlining his systems, he found
money in his business.
You don’t have to slash and burn the
moment you put down this book. You can take it slow. Just get started.
FIRE BAD CLIENTS
If you’ve read The Pumpkin Plan,
you know that while the book is outwardly marketed as a system to help business
leaders grow their companies into industry giants, it’s secretly a book about
efficiency. Letting go of clients who suck us dry and eat up our profit margins
is a way of making space for clients we can serve exceptionally well by doing
what we do best and with fewer resources. It is all about improving not only
the top line but the bottom line, too.
A study facilitated by the
Chicago-based growth-consulting firm Strategex analyzed the revenue, cost, and
profit breakdown for a thousand companies. What they found was nothing short of
a “duh” moment, as in the “Duh, I already knew this, but I still haven’t done
anything about it in my own business because I’m a glutton for punishment” type
of duh.
Strategex sorted the clients for
each company into four sections, in descending order based on revenue. For
example, if a company had a hundred clients, the twenty-five clients who
generated the most revenue were put in the top quartile, the next twenty-five
highest revenue-generating clients in the second quartile, and so on. Strategex
found that the top quartile generated 89 percent of the total revenue, while
the lowest quartile only accounted for a meager 1 percent of total revenue.
It gets worse. The study found that
each group of clients required pretty much the same amount of effort (cost and
time). This means that it took the same amount of effort to serve a big-revenue
client as it did a client who barely affected revenue at all.
Then came the awkward “gulp” moment.
Strategex’s profit analysis showed that the top quartile generated 150 percent
of a company’s profit. The two middle quartiles were effectively break-even,
and the bottom quartile, the one that generated 1 percent of the total revenue,
resulted in a profit loss of 50 percent! In the end, the profits generated from
the top clients are used, in part, to pay for the losses accrued in serving the
bottom clients.
I’m sure you know this scenario all
too well. Those clients who barely pay you peanuts, yet constantly complain
about how much you charge and how you do nothing right; the clients who demand
you rework everything you’ve done for the third time and then never pay you for
your work, or never pay you on time—those clients are costing you money. Get
rid of them. Fast!
Dumping any client who makes you
money (even if it is the worst client in the world) may seem counterintuitive
at first. But never forget what I said earlier: All revenue is not the same. If
you remove your worst unprofitable clients and the now-unnecessary costs
associated with them, you will see a jump in profitability and a reduction in
stress, often within a few weeks. Equally important, you will have more time to
pursue and clone your best clients. I’ve lost count of how many readers have
shared stories of how both their top line and bottom line improved after they
implemented this and other growth strategies I revealed in The Pumpkin Plan.
I know that sounds like bragging, but it’s not. The system isn’t some miracle I
came up with; it is just simple math.
I know how scary it feels to dump
any client when you are scrambling to cover this week’s payroll, especially if
you fought hard to get that client in the first place. But remember, profit is
about the percentages, not a single number. So take it easy on yourself. Start
by dumping one rotten little pumpkin in your patch, the one you occasionally
fantasize about leaving on a deserted island or shipping off to Mars. The
emotional distraction that client caused you and your staff will disappear
immediately. The profits you earned from other clients and were spending to
keep this bad client on board will now stay in your pocket. And since his
special requirements no longer need to be serviced, you have time and headspace
to find another, better client—an ideal client, a clone of your very best
clients.
CLONE YOUR BEST CLIENTS
Just for a moment, I want you to
think of your favorite client: the call you will always take, the person or
company you say yes to without hesitation. This is the client who pays you what
you’re worth, on time, without question. This is the client who trusts you,
respects you, and follows instructions. This is the client you love, and who
loves you. Now imagine that this client had five identical twin companies that
all wanted to work with you. Wouldn’t that boost your business? Wouldn’t it be
easy to serve those clients? Wouldn’t it help you keep your bottom line
healthy? Now imagine ten clones, or a hundred clones.
For almost any B2B business in the
world, landing a hundred clones of its best client would put it at the front of
the pack. It would dominate. The same is true for B2C businesses. If just a
mere 10 percent of their clients behaved like their number one client, those
businesses would rule, too.
Having clients with similar needs
and very similar behaviors offers a few magical profit-making benefits:
1.
You
will become superefficient, because you now serve very few but consistent
needs, rather than an excessive array of varying needs.
2.
You
will love working with your clones, which means you will naturally and
automatically provide better service. We cater to the people we care about.
3.
Marketing
will become automatic. Birds of a feather flock together (for real) and that
means your best clients hang out with other business leaders who have the “best
client” qualities you’re looking for. Your best clients are awesome, remember?
You love them and they love you, and that means they will talk you up every
chance they get.
Clones of your best clients are the
very definition of efficiency, which is why they are like gold. Find them.
Nurture them. And then find out where even more best-client clones hang out and
cultivate them, too.
THE PARETO OVERLAP
You may be familiar with the Pareto
Principle, commonly known as the 80/20 rule. For the history buffs: Vilfredo
Federico Damaso Pareto was an Italian economist who studied the distribution of
wealth in Italy in the late 1800s. He discovered that 20 percent of the Italian
population owned 80 percent of the land. Then he looked at his garden and
observed that 20 percent of the peapods contained 80 percent of the peas. Then
he looked down at his feet and exclaimed, “OMG, I own five pairs of clogs, yet
I wear these superfly boots 80 percent of the time!”
Pareto’s
Principle also applies to your clients, in that 20 percent of them yield 80
percent of your revenue. It goes further—80 percent of your profit is derived
from 20 percent of the products and/or services you offer.
The
key to this advanced strategy is to connect the two—your clients and your
offering. Some of your top clients buy most of your profitable offerings; some
of your top clients go for the offering with the lowest profit margin.
Likewise, some of your weakest clients consistently purchase your profitable
stuff and some are just weak all the way around, buying the same no-profit
stuff over and over again.
Once
you see the overlap, the decisions become very easy. Get rid of the “bad”
clients who only want your least profitable products and services. You are
losing money here, catering to clients or customers who are not a good fit for
your company.
Find
a new way to manage the weak clients who do buy your most profitable offerings.
Often, “bad” clients can become better clients if you meet with them to set new
expectations and methods of communication. Meet with your top clients who don’t
buy profitable offerings, too. Find out how you can deliver profitable stuff to
them.
When you focus on Profit First, even
when choosing the clients and customers you are willing to work with, you
increase your profit dramatically. Not only do you save money by cutting
expenses related to serving weak clients, who don’t buy profitable offerings;
you also free up your time, energy and creativity to focus on the clients you
love, who bring in the profit. Applied to your client base, the Pareto
Principle is an advanced Profit First technique that does double duty—you save
money and gain profit. Gotta love that!
SELL SMART
I’ve already mentioned Ernie, my
lawn guy, briefly, but I want you to know a little more about his story. It
speaks to how fast things can go down the “upselling” rabbit hole. In the fall
I pay my lawn service to clean up all of the leaves in our yard. A few years
ago, Ernie, the owner of the business, knocked on my door. He said, “I noticed
that there are leaves in the gutters.” He offered to remove them, for a fee.
And I, my friends, was what they called an “easy upsell.”
Ernie had just expanded his service
offering. Easy money! To complete the job, Ernie bought some ladders for his
truck. While Ernie was up on the roof, though, he realized he needed a tool to
snake out the downspouts. He also spotted more opportunities—damaged shingles,
a crack in the chimney, and a soft spot on the roof, a sign of rotting wood.
Again he asked if I wanted them fixed; I said yes, and he ran out and picked up
some roofing tools, a downspout snake tool, band saws, cement, and brick
supplies, and he hired temporary labor. Ernie came back near the end of the day
and pushed through to get it finished. He even bought floodlights to keep the
work area lit as dusk approached.
At the end of the day, I paid $1,500
for all the work. Not bad for Ernie, considering he gets paid “only” $200 to
clean the lawn. But the $1,500 he earned cost Ernie an investment of about
$2,000 for tools and supplies that day, plus a lot of driving back and forth
and the cost of hiring a laborer.
Ernie lost money on me, but he grew
his sales by a lot. Tomorrow he intends to use his new equipment and tools to
take care of other clients and will, in theory, earn his money back and then
some. The problem is, that rarely happens. As the bills mount, the pressure
grows to sell more and more; and you end up working on projects in which you
have limited experience and sometimes little interest.
As the variety of things you do
increases, you need to buy more tools and equipment and hire more specialized
labor. And none of this gets used to its maximum potential because you do many
different things, not one thing. Your stuff sits there unused. While you rake
lawns, your ladders just lie there. As you fix roofs, the leaf blowers just sit
in your truck.
You get stuck in the Survival Trap
and end up not doing a very good job at any one thing. For example, when Ernie
wrapped up for the day, he said, “I’ll be back early tomorrow to clean the lawn
again.”
Why? Because he threw the leaves
from the gutters onto the lawn he had just cleaned, as well as shingles and
other things. His additional work required that he actually redo his original
work, while all that new gear he bought just sat on his truck, not being used.
What’s efficient about that? Nada.
Across the street, my neighbors Bill
and Liza hire a different guy, Shawn, to clean up their leaves in the fall. He
also charges $200. On the same day Ernie worked on my house and earned $1,500,
Shawn serviced four more properties and also knocked on the doors at two other
properties that, by the look of their lawns, needed his help. I suspect that if
Ernie and Shawn had had a beer together that night, Ernie would have boasted
about doing one and a half times the sales Shawn pulled in, but Shawn would
have ended up paying for the drinks. Shawn has achieved efficiency, and
recognizes it as the secret sauce of profitability—getting more of the same
things done with better and better results, using fewer and fewer resources.
Selling more is the most difficult
way to increase profits, because in the best-case scenarios, the percentages
stay the same; and in the worst-case more common scenarios, expenses generated
to support sales increase faster, resulting in smaller percentages and a
smaller profit margin.
Sales without first putting
efficiency measures and systems in place is a dangerous game that only leads to
bigger expenses and fewer ideal clients. Applying efficiency strategies to your
top line—firing bad clients, cloning the good ones, refining your offering to
get the most out of your resources and then selling smart—is a surefire way to
increase profitability.
TAKE ACTION: LET GO OF DEAD WEIGHT
Step 1: Focusing
on one aspect of your business (one that benefits your best customers),
challenge yourself to figure out how to get two times the results for half the
effort.
Step 2: Using the
parameters outlined in this chapter, identify your weakest clients. Fire the
weakest links. I’m not suggesting that you get into “Take This Job and Shove
It” mode. Don’t burn any bridges. Just politely end the relationships. You’re
not dating anymore, but you can still be friends.

0 Comments